Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
Occupational and Environmental Medicine ; 80(Suppl 1):A103, 2023.
Article in English | ProQuest Central | ID: covidwho-2270155

ABSTRACT

IntroductionCanadian Paramedic services modified infection prevention and control (IPAC) practices in response to COVID-19. These changes may affect risk of exposure to infectious disease agents and can be used to inform future IPAC practices. We characterized COVID-19-related IPAC changes in the provinces of Alberta, British Columbia, Manitoba, Ontario, and Saskatchewan.Materials & MethodsQuestionnaire data (January 2021-Feb 2022) from the national COVID-19 Occupational Risks, Seroprevalence and Immunity among Paramedics (CORSIP) project was used to identify which IPAC practices were in place prior to COVID-19, and which were modified in response to COVID-19, including the timing of changes (March-May 2020;June-Aug 2020;Sept-Nov 2020;Nov 2020-present).Results2939 participants were included (146, 1249, 139, 1317, 88 from Alberta, BC, Manitoba, Ontario, and Saskatchewan, respectively), of whom 2674 (91%) reported receiving IPAC training. IPAC measures that were common prior to COVID-19 included: personal protective equipment (PPE) training, patient screening, hand hygiene, N95/P100 respirators, gowns, impermeable suits, and cleaning/disinfection. COVID-related IPAC changes included: screening staff, social distancing, restricting aerosol generating procedures, masking patients, cloth face coverings, surgical masks, face shields, and elastomeric respirators. Changes were reported for all IPAC measures. Most (71%) of these changes were made early in the COVID-19 pandemic (March-May 2020). Differences in proportions across provinces, community practice settings, and professional regulation status were reported (p < .05) for hand hygiene, PPE training, screening of patients, face shields, and various respirator types.ConclusionCanadian paramedic services were quick to modify available IPAC measures. However, these changes were variable across provinces, regulation status, and setting for specific IPAC measures. Inconsistent IPAC measures across jurisdictions may contribute to variable risk of infectious disease exposure. An evidence-informed and nationally coordinated approach may provide more equitable exposure risk mitigation for paramedic workers.

2.
Acta Pharm Sin B ; 12(5): 2206-2223, 2022 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2258955

ABSTRACT

Looking retrospectively at the development of humanity, vaccination is an unprecedented medical landmark that saves lives by harnessing the human immune system. During the ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, vaccination is still the most effective defense modality. The successful clinical application of the lipid nanoparticle-based Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna mRNA COVID-19 vaccines highlights promising future of nanotechnology in vaccine development. Compared with conventional vaccines, nanovaccines are supposed to have advantages in lymph node accumulation, antigen assembly, and antigen presentation; they also have, unique pathogen biomimicry properties because of well-organized combination of multiple immune factors. Beyond infectious diseases, vaccine nanotechnology also exhibits considerable potential for cancer treatment. The ultimate goal of cancer vaccines is to fully mobilize the potency of the immune system as a living therapeutic to recognize tumor antigens and eliminate tumor cells, and nanotechnologies have the requisite properties to realize this goal. In this review, we summarize the recent advances in vaccine nanotechnology from infectious disease prevention to cancer immunotherapy and highlight the different types of materials, mechanisms, administration methods, as well as future perspectives.

3.
Healthcare (Basel) ; 10(3)2022 Mar 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1742410

ABSTRACT

Emergency rooms (ER) are largely used by patients with oral complaints, who choose the ER over private or public dental offices for oral prevention and treatment. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the activity of most dental facilities was limited, and most hospitals and ERs were dedicated to the treatment of COVID-19 patients. The present study analyzed the number of and reason for visits at the emergency room (ER) of Ospedale dei Bambini "Vittore Buzzi", the main pediatric hospital in Milano, Italy, between 2019 and 2020, with a particular focus on oral emergencies. In 2019, 25,435 children turned to the ER, compared to 16,750 in 2020. About 10% of the children were eventually admitted to the hospital in both years. The number of admissions for infectious diseases, other than COVID-19, signed an important decrease in 2020, while trauma/injuries decreased slightly in number but increased in proportion. The number and proportion of ER visits for oral complaints decreased in 2020 compared to 2019. Stomatitis was the most frequent condition, followed by traumatic injuries, which decreased in number and percentage between 2019 and 2020. Oral infections and painful caries accounted for about 15% of the cases in both 2019 and 2020. These data highlight the need to promote territorial services for the prevention and treatment of oral health complaints, including dental emergencies.

4.
Front Pediatr ; 9: 721257, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1403496

ABSTRACT

Stopping the COVID-19 pandemic and its socio-economic consequences is only possible with a multifaceted strategy, including mass vaccination. Studies have been conducted mainly in adults, and data on the pediatric population is relatively limited. However, it appears that vaccination in children and adolescents is highly effective and safe. Despite the apparent benefits of vaccinating this age group, there are some medical and ethical concerns. Based on the above considerations, the European Academy of Paediatrics (EAP) and the European Confederation of Primary Care Pediatricians (ECPCP) assessed the current situation and presented recommendations for international and national authorities, pediatricians, and pediatric societies regarding vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 in children and adolescents.

5.
Monatsschr Kinderheilkd ; 169(12): 1167-1170, 2021.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1300441

ABSTRACT

Training periods in healthcare and free welfare settings are frequently obligatory. Temporary trainees frequently lack sufficient knowledge regarding hygiene and prevention of infections. Therefore, specific preventive measures for trainees need to be implemented in a standardized fashion, similar to those applied for permanent employees. These are legally regulated by the European Biological Agents Ordinance and the German Standing Committee on Vaccinations (STIKO) recommendations. Criteria regarding immunization against hepatitis A and B, measles, mumps, rubella, varicella, pertussis, diphtheria, tetanus, polio, influenza and COVID-19 are described. Immunization gaps should be closed at any opportunity in general (e.g. in adolescents during regular physician contacts) and specifically in medical students during the first semester and in other healthcare trainees before the start of the training period. Furthermore, individual introduction of trainees to their work areas and in particular education in health measures to protect themselves and also individuals under their care is of high importance. Education should include information on the potential risks of infection, hand hygiene practice and other personal protection measures.

6.
Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr ; 62(30): 8454-8466, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1240848

ABSTRACT

Rice bran protein (RBP) is a plant protein obtained from rice bran, a byproduct produced during rice milling process. It has been proved to be a high quality protein due to containing all of the essential amino acids and the content closing to the FAO/WHO recommended ideal pattern. Recent studies indicated that RBP and rice bran protein hydrolysates (RBPH) served variety biological functions. In this review, we summarized the classical functions of RBP and RBPH mediating antioxidant activity, chronic diseases prevention (such as antihypertensive effect, anti-diabetic effect, cholesterol-lowering activity), and anti-cancer effect. We also proposed their potential novel functions on anti-obesity effect, attenuating sarcopenia, promoting wound healing. Furthermore, the potential benefit to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients was put forward, which might provide new strategy for development and utilization of RBP and RBPH.


Subject(s)
Oryza , Plant Proteins , Protein Hydrolysates , Humans , Antioxidants/pharmacology , Oryza/chemistry , Plant Proteins/chemistry , Protein Hydrolysates/chemistry , Nutritive Value
7.
Ann Transl Med ; 9(5): 395, 2021 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1176211

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hand hygiene is one of the ways to prevent the spread of diseases. Our aim was to explore the relationship between hand washing frequency and the impact on disease, and give recommendations on the number of times to wash hands. METHODS: We searched seven electronic databases from their inception to April 11, 2020, and reference lists of related reviews for all studies on hand washing frequency and disease prevention. The Review Manager 5.3. software was used to conduct a meta-analysis. We assessed the risk of bias of included studies, and quality of evidence of the main findings. RESULTS: A total of eight studies were included. The results of the meta-analysis showed that there was no statistical significance between the effect of disease prevention and washing more than 4 times/day compared to not [odds ratio (OR) =0.61, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.37 to 1.01]. The results of a case-control study showed that compared with hand washing ≤4 times/day, hand washing 5-10 times/day (OR =0.75, 95% CI: 0.63 to 0.91) and hand washing >10 times/day (OR =0.65, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.80) could reduce the risk of disease infection. There was no statistical significance advantage to hand washing more than 10 times/day compared to 5-10 times/day (OR =0.86, 95% CI: 0.70 to 1.06). Comparing hand washing ≤10 times/day with hand washing >10 times/day, increased hand washing was a protective factor against infection (OR =0.59, 95% CI: 0.36 to 0.97). CONCLUSIONS: The more frequently hands were washed, the lower risk of disease. So far however, there is no high-quality evidence indicating the best range of hand washing frequency for disease prevention.

8.
Postgrad Med ; 132(7): 643-649, 2020 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-382140

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Recent respiratory infectious disease (RID) outbreaks of influenza and the novel coronavirus have resulted in global pandemics. RIDs can trigger nosocomial infections if not adequately prevented. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to rate the adequacy of healthcare workers (HCWs) and hospital settings on RID prevention using unannounced standardized patients (USP) in clinical settings of hospital gateways. METHODS: Trained USPs visited 5 clinical settings: information desks, registration desks, two outpatient departments and the emergency departments in 10 hospitals across 3 cities of Inner Mongolia, China. USPs observed the hospital air ventilation and distance from the nearest hand-washing facilities to each clinical setting, then mimicked symptoms of either tuberculosis or influenza before observing the HCW's behavior. A total of 480 clinical-setting assessments were made by 19 USPs. RESULTS: The overall adequacy of triage services was 86.7% and for prevention of the spread of airborne droplets was 83.5%. Almost all hospitals offered adequate air ventilation. Compared to the information desk, adequacy of triage and preventing the spread of airborne droplets by physicians in the three clinical departments was less likely to be adequate. Triage services for USPs simulating symptoms of influenza were 2.6 times more likely to be adequate than for those simulating symptoms of tuberculosis but there was no significant difference in the prevention of the spread of airborne droplets. CONCLUSIONS: There is a need to improve respiratory infectious disease procedures in our study hospitals, especially in outpatient and emergency departments.


Subject(s)
Emergency Service, Hospital , Health Personnel/standards , Infection Control/standards , Outpatient Clinics, Hospital , Patient Simulation , Respiratory Tract Infections/prevention & control , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , China , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Coronavirus Infections/transmission , Guideline Adherence , Hand Disinfection/standards , Hospitals , Humans , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Influenza, Human/transmission , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/transmission , Respiratory Tract Infections/transmission , SARS-CoV-2 , Triage/standards , Tuberculosis, Pulmonary/prevention & control , Tuberculosis, Pulmonary/transmission , Ventilation/standards
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL